If I would have followed the logic of Bill Clinton expressed to Charlie Rose last night,
In a hard-changing interview with Charlie Rose tonight, Bill Clinton said Americans who are prepared to choose someone with less experience, are prepared to "roll the dice" about the future of America. "It's less predictable, isn't it? When is the last time we elected a president based on one year of service before he's running?"
I should have never voted for him since he ran for President with no elected national government experience! The same is true of "King George", Reagan, and Carter. To answer Bill - we have done it many, many times.
When Hillary's "First Lady" experience is not considered, she actually only has seven years elected experience compared to Obama's eleven! Furthermore, Barack's teaching of constitutional law beats "First Lady" failed health reform hands down. Other than voting for Bush's holy war has Hillary done anything of real significance in her many years of what Bill considers "experience"?